Les énonciations en langue de bois, mais aussi le processus, toujours
ambivalent (reconnu ou inventé) de la 'conscientisation', let's say, qui
sont des analyses des rapports de domination : Bama, Sangati, par
exemple, 95 : 'Go on, Ma. It's by calling on all this stuff (marriage
vows, the issue being the various rights of divorce in different
communities, Christian Paraiyars, Hindu, other 'community') about God,
the promises made to him, our sins and our good deeds, and Heaven and
everlasting Hell, that the priests and nuns frightens the life out of
us. But God created us so that we can be happy and free. I am sure God
doesn't want us to be living like slaves to the day we die, without
rights or status, just because of a cord around the neck. Don't you
agree?'
102 : (chap 10 about voting) : 'And what did his party ever do for him? These rich men (Congress) use us as dice in their own games. Yet this simple fact doesn't seem to enter the thick skull of our boys.'
103 'Ambedkar-talk'.
102 : (chap 10 about voting) : 'And what did his party ever do for him? These rich men (Congress) use us as dice in their own games. Yet this simple fact doesn't seem to enter the thick skull of our boys.'
103 'Ambedkar-talk'.
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire